AMD Phenom X4 9350e - 65W quad-core

July 24, 2008 | 09:06

Tags: #overclocking

Companies: #amd

Crysis

Publisher: Electronic Arts

Crysis is seen by many as the poster boy for DirectX 10 and it will make your system cry, quite literally – it’s a monster!

It doesn’t come as much of a surprise then that the graphics are something special – at the time of release they were above and beyond anything we’d ever seen in a PC game.

We tested the game using the 64-bit executable under DirectX 10 with the 1.21 patch applied. We used a custom timedemo recorded on the Harbor map which is more representative of gameplay than the built-in benchmark that renders things much faster than you're going to experience in game.




Crysis 1.21

1280x1024, 0xAF, 0xAA, All Medium Settings

  • Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E8400 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E8200 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6550 (2x2.33GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • Athlon X2 6400+ (2x3.2GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom X4 9850 (4x2.5GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Athlon X2 6000+ (2x3.0GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom X3 8750 (3x2.4GHz 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Phenom X4 9750 (4x2.4GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E4500 (2x2.20GHz, 800MHz FSB)
  • Phenom X4 9550 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Phenom X4 9600 (4x2.3GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Phenom X4 9500 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Phenom X4 9350e (4x2.0GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Phenom X4 9350e (4x2.0GHz, 1.8GHz HTT, CnQ Enabled)
  • 48.3
  • 47.6
  • 44.8
  • 44.2
  • 43.4
  • 41.5
  • 38.4
  • 38.3
  • 35.9
  • 35.5
  • 34.7
  • 34.1
  • 33.8
  • 32.7
  • 31.9
  • 31.2
  • 30.6
  • 29.7
  • 24.6
0
10
20
30
40
50
Frames Per Second - higher is better

Crysis 1.21

1600x1200, 0xAF, 0xAA, All High Settings

  • Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E8400 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E8200 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • Phenom X4 9850 (4x2.5GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E6550 (2x2.33GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Phenom X4 9750 (4x2.4GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Athlon X2 6400+ (2x3.2GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom X3 8750 (3x2.4GHz 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Athlon X2 6000+ (2x3.0GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom X4 9550 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Phenom X4 9600 (4x2.3GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Phenom X4 9500 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E4500 (2x2.20GHz, 800MHz FSB)
  • Phenom X4 9350e (4x2.0GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Phenom X4 9350e (4x2.0GHz, 1.8GHz HTT, CnQ Enabled)
  • 29.8
  • 28.2
  • 27.7
  • 27.6
  • 27.5
  • 27.5
  • 27.4
  • 26.5
  • 26.4
  • 26.1
  • 25.9
  • 25.9
  • 25.8
  • 25.0
  • 24.7
  • 24.3
  • 24.2
  • 22.6
  • 19.8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Frames Per Second - higher is better

Gaming performance is pathetic, there's no other way to put it. Even the dual-core E4500 beats it in both high and low resolution tests and CnQ just makes the situation worse. It again reaffirms that when purchasing a CPU for gaming: core speed should be the first priority, then additional cores are secondary. The only redeeming fact is that AMD doesn't advertise this as a gaming CPU.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04